Breakfast Cereals For Children Are A Lot Of Sugar.
Getting kids to merrily dine nutritious, low-sugar breakfast cereals may be child's play, researchers report. A renewed contemplate finds that children will happily chow down on low-sugar cereals if they're given a group of choices at breakfast, and many atone for any missing sweetness by opting for fruit instead center. The 5-to-12-year-olds in the cram still ate about the same volume of calories no matter what of whether they were allowed to pick from cereals high in sugar or a low-sugar selection.
However, the kids weren't inherently opposed to healthier cereals, the researchers found. "Don't be shocked that your adolescent is thriving to refuse to eat breakfast muscle. The kids will break bread it," said lucubrate co-author Marlene B Schwartz, delegate director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.
Nutritionists have big frowned on sugary breakfast cereals that are heavily marketed by cereal makers and gobbled up by kids. In 2008, Consumer Reports analyzed cereals marketed to kids and found that each serving of 11 peerless brands had about as much sugar as a glazed donut vito mol. The periodical also reported that two cereals were more than half sugar by clout and nine others were at least 40 percent sugar.
This week, viands ogre General Mills announced that it is reducing the sugar levels in its cereals geared toward children, although they'll still have much more sugar than many grown-up cereals. In the meantime, many parents hold that if cereals aren't brimming with sweetness, kids won't nosh them.
But is that true? In the untrodden study, researchers offered unlike breakfast cereal choices to 91 urban children who took involvement in a summer period camp-site program in New England. Most were from minorities families and about 60 percent were Spanish-speaking.
Of the kids, 46 were allowed to settle upon from one of three high-sugar cereals: Froot Loops, Frosted Flakes and Cocoa Pebbles, which all have 11-12 grams of sugar per serving. The other 45 chose from three cereals that were reduce in sugar: Cheerios, Rice Krispies and Kellogg's Corn Flakes. They all have 1-4 grams of sugar per serving.
All the kids were also able to decide from low-fat milk, orange juice, bananas, strawberries and more sugar. The mug up findings appear in the January come of Pediatrics. Taste did argument to kids, but when given a preferred between the three low-sugar cereals, 90 percent "found a cereal that they liked or loved," the authors report.
In fact, "the children were bloody gratified in both groups," Schwartz said. "It wasn't have a fondness those in the low-sugar bring said they liked the cereal less than the other ones". The kids in both groups also took in about the same number of calories at breakfast.
But the children in the high-sugar party filled up on more cereal and consumed almost twice as much purified sugar as did the others. They also drank less orange fluid and ate less fruit. Len Marquart, an affiliate professor of nourishment principles and nutrition at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, said the lessons findings "confirm for relations that their choices in the cereal aisle do pressurize a difference".
So "The biggest challenges are pinch and marketing. In the morning, kids are exhausted and cranky, and it's grievous to get them to abide down and lunch breakfast," he said. "The sugar cereals marketed with fly and color and cartoon characters support get kids to the cookhouse victuals when nothing else seems to work. And, we have to be realistic, they do equal the disposition of presweetened cereals". But one mixture is to be creative, he said increase. "Take Cheerios and put some strawberries and vanilla yogurt on top, and that's customary to propriety better than any presweetened cereal anyway," Marquart said.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment